Saturday, January 11, 2020

Clinton Foundation Investigation Fake News: "Nothing of Consequence"

Fake news because the Washington Post is partisan and left leaning. So let’s understand the narrative.
washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
Has The Washington Post ever printed a headline like “Trump Was Right” or “Another Win For The Trump Administration?” 
The dirty tricks include:
1. partial information
2. information out of context
3. information based on partisan sources who lean one way but not the other
4. substitution of opinion for fact 
Exhibit A: “It found nothing of consequence.” 
Exhibit B: “inquiry launched more than two years ago to mollify conservatives clamoring for more investigations of Hillary Clinton” 
To the first point, the paper isn’t in a position to know what DOJ found. 
Citing “current and former law enforcement officials said they never expected the effort to produce much of anything” would be laughable if it weren’t so pathetic and dangerous. 
“To mollify conservatives” — uh no, actually that was how Obama sicced the IRS on conservatives. 
The paper is trying to get ahead of bad news, by pointing to the distraction tactic, which is an investigation that draws all the heat while the real work goes on under the radar. 
Find one person anywhere, conservative or liberal, who thinks Hillary is innocent of using her Foundation as a personal piggy bank. 
Did the paper interview Tom Fitton at @JudicialWatch
I am reading. 
5/31/19: “Following pressure from congressional Republicans, then-AG Jeff Sessions announced in March 2018 that Huber, a U.S. attorney from Utah, had been picked to review any misconduct by the DOJ and FBI. Some Republicans had been calling for a second special counsel.” 
Nobody knows what Huber was doing. Already 6 months ago, per the Washington Examiner, “Barr revealed Horowitz and Durham have taken over most of his [Huber’s] responsibilities.”

(Horowitz - IG) 
Barr: “Huber had originally been asked to take a look at the FISA applications and the electronic surveillance” 
Barr: Huber “stood back and put that on hold while the Office of Inspector General was conducting its review.” 
Barr: Huber “was essentially on standby” just in case the IG “referred a matter to him to be handled criminally.” 
Barr: “he has not been active on this front in recent months.” 
Now read Q (12/22/2019): Bill Barr (“stealth bomber”), John Durham and John Huber are working as a single DOJ team.
They aren’t planning to talk till after the Senate impeachment showdown.
“Barr said Durham would now be taking over Huber’s role in handling any criminal referrals from Horowitz.”

This means “Huber’s involvement with Trump-Russia matters was done.”

That’s separate from the general Clinton Foundation corruption claims. 
You didn’t get all this from the Washington Post.
“Sessions had also asked Huber in 2017 to look into...Uranium One...as well as broader claims of corruption at the Clinton Foundation.” 
“Barr seemed to suggest that what evidence Huber found, if any, may soon be revealed.” 
The whistleblower was @cain_nate
“The whistleblower, Dennis Nathan Cain, had turned the documents over to the Department of Justice’s inspector general and both the House and Senate Intelligence committees, according to the lawyer.”
“The FBI rummaged through Cain’s home for six hours, even after the whistleblower handed over the documents, according to Socarras.” 
Now read what Q said about @cain_nate
2581
Nate Cain, Whistleblower, Exposed for Safety; FBI "Intrusion" Lawsuit Will Reveal CF Evidence
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
11 Dec 2018 - 12:04:43 PM 
Read the headline written on this drop at Q map. “FBI "Intrusion" Lawsuit Will Reveal CF Evidence”

**Lawsuit will prove** 
Continue reading that Q drop. 
“NORMALLY, A WHISTLEBLOWER IS PROTECTED AND SHIELDED FROM ALL NON ESSENTIALS (CLAS).”

(classified information) 
“How do you protect a valuable witness (whistleblower)?

How do you protect the chain of custody of evidence?” 
“Name IDEN Public > FBI 'intrusion' > Lawsuit > Response to Lawsuit > Public Reveal (otherwise sealed?)
Moves & Countermoves.
Q”

The name of the whistleblower is identified in the context of a lawsuit that would otherwise be sealed. (“Hide in the light” strategy) 
Q responded to @cain_nate tweet of 12/10/2018. (You still following, Mr. Bezos?)
Q drop 2578, 12/10/2018:

“Sometimes 'intrusions' have a way of safeguarding people & evidence.”

“Sometimes 'intrusions' are a necessary event in order to safeguard chain of custody [post OIG WB status + doc handover protocols].”

(WB - whistleblower) 
Q to @cain_nate

“Active criminal investigations of this magnitude must be handled w/ extreme care.

The moment your name went 'live' there was no other choice.

Keep the faith, Patriot.

You are never alone.”

That has the ring of truth. 
Again, 3/11/2019, slightly more than two months before Barr’s interview explaining what’s the various prosecutors are doing, Q spoke to @cain_nate again, knowing he was in danger and offering a lifeline. 
To us, Anon summarized: “Nate Cain, Federal Whistleblower, Needs Our Prayers” 
To Cain:
3033
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
11 Mar 2019 - 8:49:45 PM
πŸ“
Stay in the LIGHT.
Remain in open comms w/ Sen Graham & Grassley re: Whistleblower Protection Act.
They will take your phone calls.
Q”
Contrast what the Washington Post said (“it’s nothing”) with the FBIAnon who said (beginning 7/2/2016) “there is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down.”
blackpilled.com/2017/01/fbi-an…
(Whoops this got dropped from the thread. Q telling Cain to call Graham/Grassley)
FBI Anon: “The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server.”
FBI Anon: “Clinton Foundation...imagine as a massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people.“
Money laundering is sending money for one purpose (eg climate change) but it’s really going somewhere else (bribes/payoffs for dirty work). 
QAnon has written countless times about money laundering. Connecting the Clinton Foundation to this crime on a massive scale, as part of a worldwide mafia, is perhaps the biggest QProof of all. 
FBIAnon: “Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece (albeit a big piece) of this massive shitstorm.” 
3004
Time to Advance the Rule of Law and Hold Offenders Accountable
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
9 Mar 2019 - 5:50:16 PM

“Do you target your enemies or your allies?
Why was SESSIONS targeted?
Who appointed HUBER?
Who had DIRECT OS over HUBER?
DAG also listed for optics?” 
“WHO REALLY HAD DIRECT OS OVER HUBER?
NO_LEAKS
NONE” 
“Who FIRED/REMOVED the traitors within the FBI/DOJ?
Do you believe the timing is a coincidence?” 
Who got Hillary the job overseas?

Who really got Hillary the job?

“Leave town, and never come back here again.”

(End.)
mentions 
mentions compile 
___________
By Dr. Dannielle Blumenthal. All opinions are the author's own. Public domain.