The Social Context of Corruption Research Prevents Knowledge From Being Discovered & Shared
This is a short statement about the social context in which we research corruption.
We become aware of corruption in different ways. Some are victims of crime. Some are born into crime. Some are observers of shady situations. Some work for people who are corrupt. Some experience a mixture of different factors not listed here.
For whatever reason, in whatever way, it is never just a single thing, I got drawn into researching government corruption when Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was murdered in 2010 by a rogue operation called Fast & Furious.
There are other things I do not want to mention here.
In the summer of 2016 I became aware as many of you did of FBIAnon, the leaked Podesta emails, the Alefantis instagram, etc.
Many expressed fear for my safety, including family and friends and colleagues.
Here on Twitter, Jen Moore reached out to me. She was later murdered.
I put my name out there and I therefore am unable to research every topic I would like to, to the extent that I would like, out of safety concerns.
In addition there are leads that legally cannot be investigated due to content.
I am sure it is the same for many of you.
I have experienced squeaking noises on my phone calls, blocked wifi connections, and what looks like someone taking screenshots on my cellphone. Screenshots of me while I am doing Periscopes. Broadcasts cut/interrupted.
This is repression of my civil liberties. It is not about national security. It is about preventing me from saying things or looking into things that may yield truths people don't want out there.
I am aware of this and I am grateful for the extent of the freedom that I do have. I just think it should be noted that the boundaries of the conversation are always there - they are unseen - and they affect how much we know, and what is allowed to enter our consciousness.
By Dr. Dannielle Blumenthal. All opinions are the author’s own. Public domain. Photo via Pixabay.